1. (2020高二上·上海期末) 阅读理解

Each year, backed up by a growing anti-consumerist movement, people are using the holiday season to call on us all to shop less.

Driven by concerns about resource exhaustion, over recent years environmentalists have increasingly turned their sights on our "consumer culture". Groups such as The Story of Stuff and Buy Nothing New Day are growing as a movement that increasingly blames all our ills on our desire to shop.

We clearly have a growing resource problem. The produces we make, buy, and use are often linked to the destruction of our waterways, biodiversity, climate and the land on which millions of people live. But to blame these issues on Christmas shoppers is misguided, and puts us in the old trap of blaming individuals for what is a systematic problem.

While we complain about environmental destruction over Christmas, environmentalists often forget what the holiday season actually means for many people. For most, Christmas isn't an add-on to an already heavy shopping year. In fact, it is likely the only time of year many have the opportunity to spend on friends and family, or even just to buy the necessities needed for modern life.

This is particularly, true for Boxing Day, often the target of the strongest derision(嘲弄) by anti-consumerists. While we may laugh at the queues in front of the shops, for many, those sales provide the one chance to buy items they've needed all year. As Leigh Phillips argues, "this is one of the few times of the year that people can even hope to afford such 'luxuries', the Christmas presents their kids are asking for, or just an appliance that works. "

Indeed, the richest 7% of people are responsible for 50% of greenhouse gas emissions. This becomes particularly harmful when you take into account that those shopping on Boxing Day are only a small part of our consumption "problem" anyway. Why are environmentalists attacking these individuals, while ignoring such people as Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich, who has his own￡1. 5bn yacht with a missile defence system?

Anyway, anti-consumerism has become a movement of wealthy people talking down to the working class about their life choices, while ignoring the real cause of our environmental problems. It is no wonder one is changing their behaviours—or that environmental destruction continues without any reduction in intensity.

1. （1） It is indicated in the 1st paragraph that during the holiday season, many consumers       .

   A . ignore resource problems B . are fascinated with presents C . are encouraged to spend less D . show great interest in the movement.
3. （2） It can be inferred from Paragraphs 2 and 3 that the environmentalist movement      .

   A . has targeted the wrong persons B . has achieved its intended purposes C . has taken environment-friendly measures D . has benefited both consumers and producers
5. （3） The example of Roman Abramovich is used to show environmentalists'     .

   A . madness about life choices B . discontent with rich lifestyle C . ignorance about the real cause D . disrespect for holiday shoppers
7. （4） It can be concluded from the text that telling people not to shop at Christmas is      .

   A . anything less than a responsibility B . nothing more than a bias C . indicative of environmental awareness D . unacceptable to ordinary people