当前位置: 高中英语 / 阅读理解
  • 1. (2023高一下·莲湖期中) 阅读理解

    A new study from North Carolina State University found that biology textbooks have done a poor job of including material related to climate change. For example, the study found that most biology textbooks published in the 2010s included less information about climate change than they did in the previous decade--despite significant advances in our understanding of how climate change is influencing ecosystems and the environment.

    "In short, we found biology textbooks are failing to share enough information about climate change, which is a generation-defining topic in the life sciences," says Jennifer Landin, author of the study. "These books are the baseline texts for helping students understand the science of life on Earth, yet they are providing very little information about a phenomenon that is having a great impact on habitats, ecosystems, agriculture--almost every aspect (方面) of life on Earth,"

    For the study, researchers investigated coverage of climate change in 57 college biology textbooks published between 1970 and 2019. The researchers found climate coverage has varied greatly over those five decades and that the amount of climate coverage in textbooks fell off in the 2010s. In addition to length, the nature of the content has also changed greatly over time.

    "One of the most troubling findings was that textbooks are devoting less space to addressing climate solutions now than they did in the 1990s--even as they focus more on the effects of climate change," Landin says. "That suggests to students that nothing can be done, which is both wildly misleading and contributes to a sense of fatalism (宿命论) regarding cli-mate change."

    "We are hoping that this study will serve as a wake-up call for publishers and instructors. We need to do a much better job of putting climate change into our courses if we want to pre-pare students to understand the role that climate change is playing in shaping life on Earth and how we study it," Landin says.

    1. (1) What is the example in paragraph 1 used to do?
      A . Prove biology textbooks' poor performance. B . Show the dissatisfaction with climate change. C . Attract the attention of students studying biology. D . Show the content of textbooks published in the 2010s.
    2. (2) What is the problem of biology textbooks according to Landin?
      A . No enough material about climate change. B . Providing little new information about biology. C . Not covering every aspect of life on Earth. D . No generation-defining topics in the textbooks.
    3. (3) How did the researchers conduct the study?
      A . By tracking textbook publishers. B . By doing surveys of students in colleges. C . By observing climate change for 50 years. D . By investigating college biology textbooks.
    4. (4) What does Landin expect the study to function as?
      A . A wake up call for biology science. B . A warning to take biology seriously. C . A direction of studying climate change. D . An alarm bell for publishers and teachers.

微信扫码预览、分享更方便