当前位置: 高中英语 / 阅读理解
  • 1. (2023高二上·广州月考)  阅读理解

    Over our long shared history, dogs have developed a range of skills for bonding with human beings. Their ability to make sense of human instructions like "lay down" is just one such skill. But whether dogs understand human intentions, or merely respond to outcomes, remains unclear. The ability to recognize others' intentions is a basic part of Theory of Mind, long regarded as uniquely human. Can dogs also distinguish between something done on purpose and something done by accident?

    To answer this question, a team of researchers in Germany conducted an experiment that examined how dogs reacted when food rewards were held back. They found that dogs responded differently depending on whether the actions of the experimenter were intentional or unintentional.

    The experiment was conducted under three conditions. In each condition, the dog was separated from the human tester by a transparent (透明的) barrier. Then the experimenter fed the dog pieces of dog food through a gap in the barrier. In the "unwilling" condition, the experimenter suddenly withdrew the reward through the gap in the barrier. In the "unable-clumsy" condition, the experimenter brought the reward to the gap in the barrier and "tried" to pass it through the gap but then "accidentally" dropped it. In the "unable-blocked" condition, the experimenter again tried to give the dog a reward, but was unable to because the gap in the barrier was blocked. In all conditions, the reward remained on the tester's side of the barrier.

    Not only did the dogs wait longer in the unwilling condition than in the unable conditions, they were also more likely to sit or lie down-actions often interpreted as being uninterested-and stop wagging their tails.

    The team acknowledges that their findings may be met with challenges and that further study is needed to deal with alternative explanations, such as behavioral cues (暗示) on the part of experimenters or knowledge transfer from earlier dog training. "Nevertheless," the paper concludes, "the findings present important initial evidence that dogs may have at least one aspect of Theory of Mind: the capacity to recognize intention-in-action."

    1. (1) How was the experiment carried out?
      A . By grouping the dogs and treating them differently. B . By feeding the dogs with food for good behavior. C . By observing the dogs in different conditions. D . By training the dogs about reactions to food.
    2. (2) What surely happened in the "unable-clumsy" condition?
      A . The tester collected the food back. B . The food dropped to the floor. C . The gap in the barrier was blocked. D . The dog stopped wagging its tail.
    3. (3) What do the researchers think of their findings?
      A . They partly prove Theory of Mind on dogs. B . They have met more doubts than trust. C . They are challenged by some experimenters. D . They help solve dogs' behavioral problems.
    4. (4) Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
      A . Experiment to Test Dog-human Bond. B . Dogs Have a Wide Range of Skills. C . Experiment Guided by Theory of Mind. D . Dogs Can Understand Human Intentions.

微信扫码预览、分享更方便